|-|ercules
2010-10-31 03:35:11 UTC
Graham Cooper <***@gmail.com> Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:49 AM
To: Cherie Flowers <***@bennettphilp.com.au>
Cc: ***@winqld.com.au, ***@nine.com.au, ***@nine.com.au, ***@nine.com.au, ***@nine.com.au,
***@winqld.com.au, ***@ten.com.au, ***@theage.com.au, ***@theage.com.au, ***@7perth.com.au,
***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au,
***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au,
***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au,
***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au,
***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au,
***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
RE: SATIRICAL WEBSITE WWW.BENNETTPHILP.COM
Mark Jones stated to court that I didn't attempt to or properly explain the delay in proceedings.
There are only 2 recognized reasons for delay, I explained them.
I gave the dates and duration of the incarceration and forenzic order, a printout
of the release from the forenzic order in 2009, the involuntary drugs used during
the 7 year forenzic order and the effects, and an explanation of the advice from AB LAW
of the deferred 1 year time limit after periods of incarceration and mental incapacitation.
There are several points for your consideration:-
1 - Your proposed court action would involve Bennett & Philp admitting perjury to the court.
2 - Any publicity about my decade long ordeal for being framed as The Dick Smith Food Extortionist being
brushed under the carpet by Win Television would be detrimental to yourselves and your client Win Television.
3 - An Australian Court order to close BennettPhilp.com would be ineffective in the United States
where the site is hosted at NearlyFreeSpeech.net
4 - Under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP),
section 4 provides what elements of the complaint are part of the
burden of proof that the Complainant must sustain. The Complainant
must prove that:
i. your [i.e. Respondent's] domain name is identical or confusingly similar
to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and
ii. you have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and
iii. your domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
5 - As my court case was illegally struck out with false allegations
that my defamation claim was 7 years late, exposing perjury committed
by Bennett & Philp is central to continue with my claim for damages.
6 - I currently purchase 20,000 visitors/day for my business website,
should I similarly promote www.BENNETTPHILP.com for 3 months whilst
you make a claim to the courts, 2 MILLION people will have viewed the
undisputed facts contained at the website that Mark Jones committed
perjury at my court case to have it struck out.
Relying on the facts above, your threats of using 67 high priced
lawyers against me infringes on the rights of individuals who rely on
the free exercise of their right to express themselves in cyberspace
through the creation of critical, satirical, and personal domains.
Graham Cooper
BInfTech University Of Queensland 1991
Grad. Dip. Ed. (Secondary) Curtin University 2000
Win Television Legal Firm Parody Site
To: Cherie Flowers <***@bennettphilp.com.au>
Cc: ***@winqld.com.au, ***@nine.com.au, ***@nine.com.au, ***@nine.com.au, ***@nine.com.au,
***@winqld.com.au, ***@ten.com.au, ***@theage.com.au, ***@theage.com.au, ***@7perth.com.au,
***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au,
***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au,
***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au,
***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au,
***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au,
***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au, ***@bennettphilp.com.au
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
RE: SATIRICAL WEBSITE WWW.BENNETTPHILP.COM
Mark Jones stated to court that I didn't attempt to or properly explain the delay in proceedings.
There are only 2 recognized reasons for delay, I explained them.
I gave the dates and duration of the incarceration and forenzic order, a printout
of the release from the forenzic order in 2009, the involuntary drugs used during
the 7 year forenzic order and the effects, and an explanation of the advice from AB LAW
of the deferred 1 year time limit after periods of incarceration and mental incapacitation.
There are several points for your consideration:-
1 - Your proposed court action would involve Bennett & Philp admitting perjury to the court.
2 - Any publicity about my decade long ordeal for being framed as The Dick Smith Food Extortionist being
brushed under the carpet by Win Television would be detrimental to yourselves and your client Win Television.
3 - An Australian Court order to close BennettPhilp.com would be ineffective in the United States
where the site is hosted at NearlyFreeSpeech.net
4 - Under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP),
section 4 provides what elements of the complaint are part of the
burden of proof that the Complainant must sustain. The Complainant
must prove that:
i. your [i.e. Respondent's] domain name is identical or confusingly similar
to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and
ii. you have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and
iii. your domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
5 - As my court case was illegally struck out with false allegations
that my defamation claim was 7 years late, exposing perjury committed
by Bennett & Philp is central to continue with my claim for damages.
6 - I currently purchase 20,000 visitors/day for my business website,
should I similarly promote www.BENNETTPHILP.com for 3 months whilst
you make a claim to the courts, 2 MILLION people will have viewed the
undisputed facts contained at the website that Mark Jones committed
perjury at my court case to have it struck out.
Relying on the facts above, your threats of using 67 high priced
lawyers against me infringes on the rights of individuals who rely on
the free exercise of their right to express themselves in cyberspace
through the creation of critical, satirical, and personal domains.
Graham Cooper
BInfTech University Of Queensland 1991
Grad. Dip. Ed. (Secondary) Curtin University 2000
Dear Sir,
Please find attached correspondence of Mr Mark Jones for your urgent
attention.
Yours faithfully,
Cherie Flowers
Solicitor
<http://www.bennettphilp.com.au/>
Level 16 / 15 Adelaide St Brisbane Q 4000
GPO BOX 463 Brisbane Q 4001
P: (07) 3001 2999 F: (07) 3001 2989
www.BENNETTPHILP.comPlease find attached correspondence of Mr Mark Jones for your urgent
attention.
Yours faithfully,
Cherie Flowers
Solicitor
<http://www.bennettphilp.com.au/>
Level 16 / 15 Adelaide St Brisbane Q 4000
GPO BOX 463 Brisbane Q 4001
P: (07) 3001 2999 F: (07) 3001 2989
Win Television Legal Firm Parody Site
--
A woman satisfied is a woman who could have been begging for more..
A woman satisfied is a woman who could have been begging for more..